Always Consult A Solicitor For Legal Advice

Personal Injury Compensation

Late Diagnosis Breast Cancer Compensation Action Settled with HSE for €600k

Posted: July 24th, 2018

A €600,00 late diagnosis compensation settlement has been awarded to the family of a 26-year-old woman who died of breast cancer in theit High Court action against the Health Service Executive in relation to the care she received when she first attended the Mid Western Regional Hospital in Ennis with a lump on her breast.

The woman, Edel Kelly, had two young sons age six and three years of age when she died after suffering from breast cancer on June 21, 2008.

It is alleged that the lump she presented with in August 2006 at the Mid Western Regional Hospital, Ennis, Co Clare the same cancer which was subsequently diagnosed in October 2007 at a different hospital.

Legal Counsel for the family Oonah McCrann SC told the High Court today that there was an unnecessary delay of 13 months in the diagnosis of the young mother’s breast cancer and a resulting delay to her treatment.

The legal action was taken by Edel’s long-term partner Noel McGreene, Cluain na Mara, Carrigaholt Road, Kilkee, Co Clare, against HSE in relation to the care Edel had received at the Ennis hospital. She (Edel) was referred by her GP on July 26, 2006 to a breast clinic at the Mid Western Regional Hospital, Ennis after finding a lump on her breast.

Ms Kelly was taken for an ultrasound and irregular soft tissue about 2cm wide was identified in her left breast. In October she had a biopsy but it indicated that the tissue was benign. 12 months later on October 23, 2007 she attended the breast clinic at the Mid-Western Regional Hospital in Limerick and and a 6cm mass was found in her left breast. A subsequent a biopsy indicated the presence of cancer. In November 2007, a specialist advised the young mother that she had ten months to a year to twelve months to live at best.

Breach of duty was accepted by the HSE in the case but the court heard that causation was at issue in the action.

Mr Justice Kevin Cross approved the late diagnosis compensation settlement.

Women Affected by CervicalCheck Scandal to be given €2,000 ‘Immediate Ex Gratia’ Payment

Posted: June 14th, 2018

The State of to make a one-off payment of €2,000 to the 209 women who experienced a delayed cancer diagnosis in the recent CervicalCheck scandal.

An interim report into the scandal released a statement saying that “an immediate ex gratia” payment will be made to every woman affected, including Vicky Phelan, or to the next of kin of those who have already died.

The Government approved this payment after Health Minister Simon Harris briefed colleagues in a meeting earlier today. Theym the cabinet, were meeting to discuss the initial interim report made by Dr Gabriel Scally who is heading up the investigation into the scandal.

Minister Harris released a statement saying: “This payment relates to addressing any financial obstacles women might encounter in having their voices heard as part of his work.  It would not be a bar to further payment in due course.”

Dr Scally’s interim report also recommends:

  • The Provision of a more detailed guide to the CervicalCheck screening programme be made accessible online.
  • That the information statements sent to women about the restrictions of the tests should be less complicated about the potential reasons why screening might not identify abnormalities that are visible as these can lead to the development of cervical cancer.
  • That the details for women the come with the consent form should guarantee that they will have total access to their cervical screening record when they need it.
  • That the information for women that is sent with the consent form should guarantee that if there be an issue or error of any significance with the screening or reporting process, open disclosure of all the details will take place in a swift, considerate and transparent.

Mr Harris said it is believed, by Dr Scally, that the provision of information to women in Ireland who take part in screening tests “is comparable with that available elsewhere and in some respects is better. He also found that the process of completing a consent form at the time of screening is a major strength of the Irish programme. However, he does make a number of important recommendations to improve the information provided to women, including strengthening the statements on the limitations of screening. I will immediately ask the HSE to implement the four recommendations related to this.”

Although Dr Scally has submitted an initial report as per the stated schedule it is felt that he will be unable to meet the end of June deadline for a final submission of his report.

Father ‘Unhappy’ with €37,500 Car Accident Compensation for His Two Children

Posted: April 13th, 2018

€37,500 car accident compensation awarded to two children injured in a car accident has been described as ‘inadequate’ by the father of the children.

The compensation award was divided as €20,000 for his nine-year-old in relation to a suspected fracture of his left arm and €17,500 for his seven-year-old brother in relation to soft tissue injuries.

The boys were injured in a car accident which occurred on March 26, 2016 and had sued an insured motorist, Dusan Gabor through their father.

Through the boy’s Barrister John Nolan their father, Graham Comiskey, told Judge Terence O’Sullivan in the Circuit Civil Court that was not satisfied with either settlement.

Mr Nolan said: “While the boys have sued through their father, Mr Comiskey, I have to consider the interests of the children and I do not believe they would gain higher awards in a full trial and may even be awarded much less”.

Mr Comiskey referred to the Book of Quantum in relation the compensation for such injuries and the settlements. He compared the settlement for his boys and stated that they were at the lower end of suggested damages.

He also queried if it would be possible for him to appeal should the judge go ahead and approve the road accident compensation settlements.

Judge O’Sullivan explained to Mr Comiskey a different judge may award a lower amount of road accident compensation. He added that he was happy that the compensation fell in the range of €15,000 and €20,000.

Counsel for the Comiskey family told the Court that this had been explained to Mr Comiskey. However, the boys’ father was still eager to oppose accepting the offers.

Judge O’Sullivan chose to approve both child accident compensation settlement offers and said that the monies be paid into court funds on behalf of the children in question.

He also advised Mr Comiskey: “Any decision of the Circuit Court can be appealed.”

 

Man ‘lucky to survive’ when tree fell on him during storm awarded €165k

Posted: March 17th, 2018

A €165,000 High Court Settlement has been approved for a man who suffered multiple severe injuries when a tree fell on him during stormy weather.

Mr Justice Kevin Cross was told that John Haskins Junior (37) ‘lucky to survive the accident which happened four years ago. Mr Haskins sustained fractures to the spine, ribs and ankle. As a result of the incident he spent the two months after it in hospital receiving treatment.

Taking the action through his father Mr Haskins Jnr, who lives in Athy, Co Kildare sued Camphill Communities of Ireland, proprietor of a health care center located in  Dunshane House, Brannmockstown, Naas, Co Kildare, due to the suffering he experienced in the accident that occurred on February 12, 2014.

Mr Haskins Jr was an inpatient at the health care facility when the accident occurred as he has Asperger syndrome. Mr Haskins’ legal counsel advised the High Court that he was walking through the garden of the centre, a mature beech tree dropped and hit him. It is alleged that the tree was known to be diseased and, despite this, was not removed from the area where it posed a threat to anyone close by. Additionally, they claimed that an alleged failure to maintain, fix or removed the tree or take the necessary steps to make it safe. The area could have been fences off or, ideally, the tree would have been felled.

It was also claimed there was a failure to take any adequate or effective measures to fence off or secure the area or to have the tree completely removed.

The claims were refuted as, it was claimed, the tree was alive and did not give the appearance of being in any way unhealthy. The decay in the tree root could only have been detected by a trained arboriculturist according to the defendant.

Hugh Mohan SC, for Mr Haskins, referred to a consultant report for his side which stated that there was a decay and fungus in the tree and it had led to rot developing in the roots and the wood then becoming degraded and subject to fracture.

Mr Justice Cross, in approving the settlement, commented that Mr Haskins had made a fantastic recovery after suffering major injuries.

Appeal in Garda Injury Compensation for Work Accident Claim

Posted: January 25th, 2018

A Garda, who sustained a disfigured fingernail injury  in a work accident that involved a Garda car door slamming shut on his left small finger has appealed the refusal to allow him pursue a work place injury compensation claim.

Garda Noel Callan, who was apprehending a drunk and violent man when the incident occurred, argued that the Minister for Justice’s refusal to allow a compensation claim (under the Garda Compensation Acts) as, based on the medical reports and evidence made available to him, the injury was minor was incorrect.

The High Court heard the challenge to that refusal on Wednesday and Mr Justice Max Barrett has reserved judgment in relation to it.

Richard Kean SC, acting on behalf of Garda Callan told the Hight Court that, as per the Garda Compensation Acts, a Garda who sustains a work injury has the right to claim personal injury compensation through the courts. He added that gardai are awarded sums in cases where it is deemed appropriate.

However, Garda Callan’s legal team agreed with the fact that the Justice Minister must give permission for a work injury compensation to be take and is under no obligation. Indeed, they may refuse to do so if they feel that the injured party suffered was minor injuries.

However, the term ‘minor injury’ is not defined in the legislation. Due to this Mr Kean argued that, though the injury was not profound or significant, it still should not be referred to as a minor injury. He went on to say that the Justice Minister’s ruling was not sound and did not properly review the medical reports that were produced at the initial hearing.

The court was told that Garda Callan is right handed and received treatment on his left hand’s smallest finger. He was also absent from work for the seven days immediately after the incident occurred.

Mr Callan suffered a lacerated fingernail bed and his fingernail had to be taken off. Due to this he felt experienced constant over the following eight months including a loss of sensation and tenderness when he was driving his car and completing other everyday tasks.

Mr Kean described the incident in which Garda Callan sustained the fingernail injury when was on duty at Swords, Co Dublin, on August 26 2011.  After a drunk man became violent, having being arrested in relation to public order offences, a car door slammed on Garda Callan’s left hand inflicting the injury.

The medical report submitted made reference the fact the fingernail was irregular and deformed when it grew back. Garda Callan experience ongoing pain and tenderness, more so during periods of colder weather.

Legal Representatives for the Justice Minister, opposing Garda Callan’s application argued that all the medical evidence was considered at the first hearing, including a medical report stating Garda Callan had practically fully recovered from the injury. It was because of this that the Justice Minister felt this this was a minor injury concerning the appearance of Garda Callan’s fingernail.

Judgement has been reserved by Judge Max Barrett

Galway City Council Pays Out Over €4m for Personal Injury Compensation Claims Over Three Years

Posted: December 15th, 2017

A recent media report has showed that Galway city has spent over €4 million in personal injury claim compensation since the start of 2015.

The huge outlay on insurance covers liability in all public areas, as well as covering the excess necessary on all compensation claims that are taken. The figures for this excess amounted to €142,000 in 2016; €242,000 in 2015; and €205,000 in 2014.

These figures, obtained by the Connacht Tribune newspaper through a Freedom of Information request, indicate that the cost of public liability insurance for Galway City Council was  €3.4 million over the period in question. The costs, when view year on year are €1.5 million for 2014, €1.4 million in 2015 and just less than €500,000 in 2016.

A large party of the injury compensation actions taker were for injuries from in falls on the streets of Galway city.

It was revealed, in August 2017, that Galway City Council is now replacing the paving and cobbles on the Shop Street thoroughfare due to the high number of people falling over and hurting themselves badly.

A spokesperson for Galway City Council that plans had been made to address the uneven paving on the streets of the town which has been the cause of a number of compensation claims.

This follows from march 2017 report which highlighted the fact that over €63 million was paid out in personal injury compensation claims by Dublin’s four local authorities in a five-year period

Dublin City Council paid out the most personal injury compensation, €41,322,784.12 to 3,853 claimants for the time period 2012-16. At the time of the report a South Dublin County Council  Representative said: “The majority of cases in relation to public liability cases are trips, slips and falls on footpaths/roads, or in public parks. A small number of claims are in regard to damage to property, i.e. car tyres.”

 

€32,000 Dog Attack Compensation Paid After Boy (12) Bitten in Attack

Posted: November 2nd, 2017

15-year-old schoolboy Adam Russell was today awarded €32,000 compensation for personal injuries after being attacked and bitten in the face by a neighbour’s German Pointer dog

Legal Representations for Mr Russell, Barrister Brian Sugrue, claimed the boy was at the home of Erica Deacon and Eoin Gibson in the Ballinclea Heights estate in Killiney, Co Dublin when the dog, a Weimaraner short-haired German pointer, attacked him (Adam).

Circuit Court President Justice Raymond Groarke was told by Mr Sugrue that Adam Russell, who was 12 years old at the time of the attack, was attacked and bitten on his face by the dog while trying to play with it.

Adam, taking the legal compensation case through his father Colm Russell, was playing at the house belonging to Deacon and Gibson on 28 September 2013 when the German Pointer dog suddenly bit him.

He was taken, for treatment, to the Swiftcare Clinic, Dundrum, Dublin, where the cut to his face were dealt with by physicians. His nose injury was sutured and the wound just under his lower lip had been closed with surgical glue. The tooth injury suffered was later treated by dentists at Dalkey Dental Clinic.

Adam Russell’s injured tooth would possibly, according to Mr Sugrue, need a crown in the future but part of the €32,000 dog attack compensation settlement offer took future dental work into consideration.

Consultant Plastic Surgeon Patricia Eadie had examined Adam’s scars in 2016 and the court was told that revision surgery may have to take place. The scarring on his nose is permanent.

Judge Groarke was told that Mr Sugrue was approving acceptance of the €32,000 child injury compensation offer.  Mr Groarke said that, while not generous, this offer was within the normal range of compensation for such dog attack injuries.  The dog attack compensation offer was approved and will be invested in court funds until December 19 2019 when Adam Russell becomes 18 years of age.

€25k Compensation Settlement for 2012 Tayto Park Accident

Posted: October 12th, 2017

The High Court has approved a personal injury compensation settlement for €25,000 in relation to a 2012 accident that involved an 8-year-old boy being injured following a fall from a playground tower.

Conor Bolger, now aged 13, of Briarfield Road, Kilbarrack, took a child injury compensation action against Ashbourne Visitor Centre Ltd, Co Meath (trading as Tayto Park) through his father Brian Bolger. He (Conor) had to have pins inserted in his lower arm when he fractured his elbow in the fall that occurred on March 25 2012.

The Bolger family’s legal team claimed that there was overcrowding on the playground tower when Conor fell and this caused the accident. Additionally, they claimed that the area surrounding the playground tower had insufficient protective wood chips on the ground, a measure designed to protect individuals from injury in the event of a fall. They also claimed that the regularity of appropriate safety inspections was insufficient and that this contributed to the extent and severity of the injuries Conor suffered.

Ashbourne Visitor Centre (Tayto Park) legal counsel David McGrath SC dismissed these claims stating that Mr Bolger “just fell” and there were no safety concerns regarding overcrowding on the tower at the time of the incident. Conor Bolger’s family, the court was advised, were happy with the proposed €25,000 child injury compensation settlement.

High Court Justice Kevin Cross approved the child injury compensation settlement and commented that Conor’s scar, due to the  insertion of the pins to treat the fractured elbow, was not “too upsetting”. Justice Cross also said, in his approval, that he (Conor) would have been affected due to being unable to play basketball for a duration of time after the accident operation.

Award of Jogger Injury Compensation Increased due to False Accusations

Posted: July 6th, 2017

An award of jogger injury compensation has been increased to account for the upset the plaintiff suffered when accused of making a fraudulent claim.

In September 2011, the twenty-four year old jogger was returning to the Clondalkin caravan site in Dublin when he tripped on a hole in the footpath and fell – fracturing the knuckle of a finger in his right hand. He subsequently had to undergo surgery for his injury, which has left him with a permanent scar.

The man claimed jogger injury compensation from South Dublin County Council – the owners of the land on which the accident occurred – but the council disputed liability for his injury, alleging that the jogger – who was also an amateur boxer – had injured his knuckle in a boxing match.

The claim for jogger injury compensation went to the High Court where it was heard by Mr Justice Anthony Barr. During cross-examination, the council´s legal representatives argued the man had suffered soft tissue injuries in a car accident the previous day and would not have been out jogging the following morning.

They repeated their allegations that the injury had been sustained in a boxing match, and insinuated through their questioning of the plaintiff that the jogger injury compensation claim was fraudulent. However, Judge Barr accepted the evidence of a medical witness giving testimony on behalf of the plaintiff that the man was just trying to run off his soft tissue injury.

The judge concluded this was a “credible explanation” for why the man had been out jogging and found in the plaintiff´s favour. Judge Barr added there was no evidence to suggest the jogger was making a fraudulent claim, and awarded him €55,000 jogger injury compensation plus a further €5,000 in aggravated damages for the upset caused by the council´s unjustified allegations.

Girl Receives Compensation for Swimming Pool Accident

Posted: April 18th, 2017

A judge has approved a settlement of compensation made to a young girl after an accident in a swimming pool left her with a visible scar on her face.

In August 2012, a young girl (eight years old at the time of the incident)was on a family holiday to the Sol Principe Hotel in Torremolinos on the Costa Del Sol. While the girl was swimming in the hotel´s pool, another guest dived into the pool, landing on top of her. This pushed her to the bottom of the pool,  causing her chin to collide with the tiles, cutting it.

The girl received on-site medical attention, and was taken by her family to a local medical clinic.The cut to her chin was cleaned and seristrips were applied to the wound. As a result of the accident, the girl suffered pain, distress and discomfort. She was left with a pale scar on her chin, 1 cm in length. The family sought legal counsel, and through her father she claimed compensation for a Spanish swimming pool accident against the hotel and the travel agent through whom the holiday had been booked.

In the claim for compensation for a Spanish swimming pool accident, it was alleged the hotel – and, by association, the travel agent – had been negligent and failed in its breach of duty by failing to take adequate precautions while guests were using the swimming pool. It was also alleged there was a lack of adequate supervision of the fellow guest that had dived into the pool, and more staff on site would have prevented the accident from occurring.

The defendants denied liability, and a full defence was entered against the claim. It was also argued that the case should be heard in Spain, rather than in Ireland, because of the location in which it took place. However, at the Circuit Civil Court, Mr Justice Raymond, heard that an initial offer of settlement amounting to €5,000 compensation for a Spanish swimming pool accident had been made by the two defendants, without admission of liability.

The offer of settlement was of a value that would be offered to the girl if the family were to successfully bring a claim in Spain. Judge Groarke heard that the offer had been since increased to €12,500 after initially being rejected by the family. Due to continued disputes of liability, the family had agreed to accept the increased offer. The judge said, in the circumstances he was happy to approve the settlement of compensation for a Spanish swimming pool accident.

FREE Claim Assessment

Our 100% Guarantee to you:
  • Speak to a specialist injury claim solicitor
  • No pressure
  • Impartial and practical advice provided
  • Helpful and courteous at all times
  • No legal jargon